Should we pick an AI tool and then find use cases for it?
The short answer
No. That's backwards, and it's how a lot of AI projects start: someone sees a demo, someone says "we should use that", and the team spends a quarter looking for a problem shaped like the tool. Start from the outcome instead. Step one: write the result you want in one sentence, with a number in it. Not "use AI". Something like "invoices paid in two days instead of nine" (example). Step two: find the slowest step between here and there. It's usually a person waiting on another person. Step three: fix that step with the cheapest thing that works. Sometimes that's an agent. Sometimes it's a shared spreadsheet. Sometimes it's a phone call. The tool comes last. It's the least interesting decision in the room. If your AI roadmap is a list of tools, it's a shopping list.
Outcome first
- Write the result in one sentence.
- Fix the slowest step.
- Pick the tool last.
Want this applied to your actual workflow? That part isn't a cartoon. Work with Eduardo. Longer writing: The Compounding Founder.
Watch the episode
ep. 1 · Mon, Oct 19
Start from the outcome
"Most AI projects start with a demo. That's the problem."
the prior it challenges:
Pick the tool, then find the use case